3

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

4

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

5

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Income Statements (Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

*The company recorded operating loss and so the diluted EPS will not be calculated for the diluted EPS effect is anti-dilutive.

6

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

7

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

8

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited, Continued)

See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

9

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 1 - Nature of operations

Mentor Capital, Inc. (“Mentor” or “the Company”), reincorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in September 2015. The entity was originally founded as an investment partnership in Silicon Valley, California by the current CEO in 1985 and subsequently incorporated under the laws of the State of California on July 29, 1994. On September 12, 1996, the Company’s offering statement was qualified pursuant to Regulation A of the Securities Act, and the Company began to trade its shares publicly. On August 21, 1998, the Company filed for voluntary reorganization and, on January 11, 2000, the Company emerged from Chapter 11. The Company relocated to San Diego, California and contracted to provide financial assistance and investment into small businesses. On May 22, 2015, a corporation, named Mentor Capital, Inc. (“Mentor Delaware”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. A shareholder approved merger between Mentor and Mentor Delaware was approved by the California and Delaware Secretaries of State, and became effective September 24, 2015, thereby establishing Mentor as a Delaware corporation.

Beginning September 2008, after the name change back to Mentor Capital, Inc., the Company’s common stock traded publicly under the trading symbol OTC Markets: MNTR and after February 2015 as OTCQB: MNTR. Effective August 6, 2018, the Company’s common stock will trade under the trading symbol OTCQX: MNTR.

In 2009, the Company began focusing its investing activities in leading edge cancer companies. In 2012, in response to government limitations on reimbursement for certain highly technical and expensive cancer treatments and a resulting business decline in the cancer immunotherapy sector, the Company decided to exit that space. In the summer of 2013 the Company was asked to consider investing in a cancer related project with a medical marijuana focus. On August 29, 2013, the Company decided to divest of its cancer assets and focus future investments in the cannabis and medical marijuana sector.

Mentor has a 51% interest in Waste Consolidators, Inc. (“WCI”). WCI was incorporated in Colorado in 1999 and operates in Arizona and Texas. It is a legacy investment which was acquired prior to the Company’s current focus on the cannabis sector and is included in the condensed consolidated financial statements presented. The Company may divest of WCI in the future to concentrate solely on cannabis investments.

On April 18, 2016, the Company formed Mentor IP, LLC (“MCIP”), a South Dakota limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Mentor. MCIP was formed to invest in intellectual property and specifically to hold the investment in patent interests obtained on April 4, 2016 when Mentor Capital, Inc. entered into an agreement with R. Larson and Larson Capital (“Larson”) to seek and secure the benefits of mutual effort directed toward the capture of license fees from domestic and foreign THC and CBD cannabis vape patents. See Note 21.

On April 13, 2017 Mentor entered into an agreement to provide $40,000 of funding to offset costs of the application of cannabis oil in a glaucoma study conducted by and otherwise paid for by Dr. Robert M. Mandelkorn, MD. Mentor, doing business as GlauCanna, will hold an 80% interest in any commercial opportunities that result from the study. Dr. Mandelkorn will hold the remaining 20%.

On June 30, 2017, the Company converted its original $100,000 convertible promissory note to Electrum Capital Partners, LLC (“Electrum”) plus accrued and unpaid interest of $7,772 into an equity interest in Electrum, at a conversion price of $19 per interest, for 5,672 membership interest units. The investment in Electrum is reported in the consolidated balance sheets as a minority investment at cost of $107,772 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, see Note 14.

10

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 1 - Nature of operations (continued)

On April 28, 2017 the Company invested a second $100,000 in Electrum (Note II) as a convertible note with interest at 10% compounded monthly, with monthly payments of principal and interest of $2,290 beginning June 12, 2017. On May 31, 2018, the Company converted the outstanding Note II balance of $85,188 plus unpaid interest of $1,068 into 526 membership interest units. The investment in Electrum is reported in the consolidated balance sheets as a minority investment at cost of $86,256 at June 30, 2018. The outstanding balance on Note II at December 31, 2017 was $94,806, see Note 8.

On September 19, 2017, the Company formed Mentor Partner I, LLC (“Partner I”), a California limited liability company as a wholly owned subsidiary of Mentor for the purpose of cannabis-focused investing. For the period of inception to December 31, 2017 there were no operations. From January through April 2018, Mentor contributed $825,000 of capital to Partner I to facilitate the purchase of manufacturing equipment to be leased from Partner I by G FarmaLabs Limited (“G Farma”) under a Master Equipment Lease Agreement dated January 16, 2018.

On February 1, 2018, the Company formed Mentor Partner II, LLC (“Partner II”), a California limited liability company as a wholly owned subsidiary of Mentor for the purpose of cannabis-focused investing. On February 8, 2018, Mentor contributed $400,000 to Partner II to facilitate the purchase of manufacturing equipment to be leased from Partner II by Pueblo West Organics, LLC (“Pueblo West”) under a Master Equipment Lease Agreement dated February 11, 2018.

Condensed consolidated financial statements

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full years.

Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes include the activity of majority owned subsidiaries of 51% or more. The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Recent Accounting Standards

From time to time, the FASB or other standards setting bodies issue new accounting pronouncements. Updates to the FASB ASCs are communicated through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update ("ASU"). Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be adopted in the future, is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

Revenue Recognition – As of January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09). Under the new guidance, an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Leasing revenue recognition is specifically excluded and therefore the new standard is only applicable to service fee and consulting revenue. A five-step model has been introduced for an entity to apply when recognizing revenue. The new guidance also includes enhanced disclosure requirements. The guidance was effective January 1, 2018 and was applied on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption did not have an impact on our financial statements.

11

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Recent Accounting Standards (continued)

Lease Accounting - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-2, “Leases” (ASU 2016-02) which requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all leases, including operating leases, with terms of more than 12 months. The new guidance also requires additional disclosures on the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. These disclosures include qualitative and quantitative information. The new guidance will be effective for us at the beginning of fiscal year 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

We also adopted the following standards during 2018, none of which had a material impact on our financial statements or financial statement disclosures

Segment reporting

The Company has determined that there are two reportable segments: 1) the cannabis and medical marijuana segment, including leasing activities relating to manufacturing equipment, and 2) the Company’s legacy investment in WCI which works with business park owners, governmental centers, and apartment complexes to reduce their facility related operating costs.

Use of estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements, and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Significant estimates relied upon in preparing these consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition, accounts and notes receivable reserves, expected future cash flows used to evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, estimated fair values of long-lived assets used to record impairment charges related to goodwill, amortization periods, accrued expenses, and recoverability of the Company’s net deferred tax assets and any related valuation allowance.

Although the Company regularly assesses these estimates, actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from management’s estimates if past experience or other assumptions do not turn out to be substantially accurate.

Concentrations of cash

The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents in bank deposit accounts which at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts nor does the Company believe it is exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all short-term debt securities purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no short-term debt securities as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

12

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Cash in attorney trust account

The Company had combined balances of $0 and $314,536 in two attorney trust accounts at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The balances could be withdrawn at the option of the Company and did not bear interest.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable consist of trade accounts arising in the normal course of business and are classified as current assets and carried at original invoice amounts less an estimate for doubtful receivables based on a review of outstanding balances on a monthly basis. The estimate of allowance for doubtful accounts is based on the Company's bad debt experience, market conditions, and aging of accounts receivable, among other factors. If the financial condition of the Company's customers deteriorates resulting in the customer's inability to pay the Company's receivables as they come due, additional allowances for doubtful accounts will be required. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company has recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts in the amount of $24,006 and $73,105, respectively.

Investments in securities, at fair value

Investment in securities consist of debt and equity securities reported at fair value. The Company adopted ASU 2016-1 effective January 1, 2018 which requires that any change in fair value is reported in net income. The adoption of the guidance resulted in the recognition of $34,822 of net after-tax unrealized gains on equity investments as a cumulative effect adjustment that decreased our retained deficit as of January 1, 2018 and decreased AOCI by the same amount. The Company elected to report changes in the fair value of equity investment in realized investment gains (losses), net.

The Company’s investments in entities where it is a minority owner and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence are recorded at fair value if readily determinable. If the fair market value is not readily determinable, the investment is recorded under the cost-method. Under this method, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of such investee company is not included in the Company’s financial statements. The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-term investments for impairment each reporting period.

Convertible notes receivable

The Company had a convertible note receivable from Electrum Partners, LLC (“Electrum”) under an Addendum to Convertible Note and Purchase Option Agreement (“Addendum”) dated April 28, 2017. Under the Addendum, the Company invested $100,000 in Electrum by purchase of a second promissory note in principal face amount of $100,000 (“Note II”) from Electrum, with interest at 10% per annum compounded monthly. Note II required monthly principal and interest payments of $2,290 to the Company beginning June 12, 2017. On May 31, 2018, the Company elected to convert the residual principal and accrued but unpaid interest totaling $86,256 into an equity investment in Electrum at $164 per unit for 526 membership interest units.

13

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Convertible notes receivable (continued)

The Company has two $25,000 convertible notes receivable from NeuCourt, Inc. that are recorded at the aggregate principal face amount of $50,000 plus accrued interest of $2,840 and $1,565 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The notes bear 5% interest with one $25,000 principal face amount note maturing on November 8, 2018 and a second $25,000 principal face amount note maturing on October 25, 2019. No payments are required prior to maturity. Principal and unpaid interest may be converted into a blend of shares of a to-be-created series of Preferred Stock, and Common Stock, of NeuCourt (defined as “Conversion Shares”) (i) on closing of a future financing round of at least $750,000, (ii) on the election of NeuCourt on maturity of the Note, or (iii) an election of Mentor following NeuCourt’s election to prepay the Note. The Conversion Price for the Note is the lower of (i) 75% of the price paid in the Next Equity Financing, or the price obtained by dividing a $3,000,000 valuation cap by the fully diluted number of shares. The number of Conversion Shares issued on conversion shall be the quotient obtained by dividing the outstanding principal and unpaid accrued interest on a Note to be converted on the date of conversion by the Conversion Price (the “Total Number of Shares”), The total Number of Shares shall consist of Preferred Stock and Common Stock as follows: (i) That number of shares of Preferred Stock obtained by dividing (a) the principal amount of each Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder by (b) the price per share paid by other purchasers of Preferred Stock in the Next Equity Financing (such number of shares, the "Number of Preferred Stock") and (ii) that number of shares of Common Stock equal to the Total Number of Shares minus the Number of Preferred Stock. Using the valuation cap of $3,000,000, the Notes would convert into 251,619 and 242,666 Conversion Shares at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2017, respectively. In the event of a Corporate Transaction prior to repayment or conversion of the Note, the Company shall receive back two times its investment, plus all accrued unpaid interest. NeuCourt is a Delaware corporation that is developing a technology that is expected to be useful in the cannabis space.

Investment in account receivable, net of discount

On April 10, 2015, the Company entered into an exchange agreement whereby the Company received an investment in account receivable with installment payments of $117,000 through 2026. The investment is stated at face value, net of unamortized purchase discount. The discount is amortized to interest income over the term of the exchange agreement.

The Company, through its subsidiaries, is the lessor of manufacturing equipment subject to leases under master leasing agreements. The leases contain an element of dealer profit and lessee bargain purchase options at prices substantially below the subject assets’ estimated residual values at the exercise date for the options. Consequently, the Company classified the leases as sales-type leases (the “finance leases”) for financial accounting purposes. For such finance leases, the Company reports the discounted present value of (i) future minimum lease payments (including the bargain purchase option, if any) and (ii) any residual value not subject to a bargain purchase option as a finance lease receivable on its balance sheet and accrues interest on the balance of the finance lease receivable based on the interest rate inherent in the applicable lease over the term of the lease. For each finance lease, the Company recognized revenue in an amount equal to the net investment in the lease and cost of sales equal to the net book value of the equipment at inception of the applicable lease.

Credit quality of notes receivable and finance leases receivable and credit loss reserve

As our notes receivable and finance leases receivable are limited in number, our management is able to analyze estimated credit loss reserves based on a detailed analysis of each receivable as opposed to using portfolio-based metrics. Our management does not use a system of assigning internal risk ratings to each of our receivables. Rather, each note receivable and finance lease receivable are analyzed quarterly and categorized as either performing or non-performing based on certain factors including, but not limited to, financial results, satisfying scheduled payments and compliance with financial covenants. A note receivable or finance lease receivable will be categorized as non-performing when a borrower experiences financial difficulty and has failed to make scheduled payments. As part of the monitoring process we may physically inspect the collateral or a borrower’s facility and meet with a borrower’s management to better understand such borrower’s financial performance and its future plans on an as-needed basis.

14

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Property and equipment

Property, equipment and machinery are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line and declining balance methods over the estimated useful lives of various classes of property ranging from 3 to 7 years.

Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized and maintenance and repairs are charged to expense. Upon retirement or sale, the cost of assets disposed, and the accumulated depreciation is removed from the accounts. The resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income.

Long-lived assets impairment assessment

In accordance with the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350, we regularly review the carrying value of intangible and other long-lived assets for the existence of facts or circumstances, both internally and externally, that suggest impairment. The carrying value and ultimate realization of these assets is dependent upon our estimates of future earnings and benefits that we expect to generate from their use. If our expectations of future results and cash flows are significantly diminished, intangible assets and other long-lived assets may be impaired and the resulting charge to operations may be material. When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles or other long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more indicators of impairment, we use the projected undiscounted cash flow method to determine whether an impairment exists, and then measure the impairment using discounted cash flows.

Goodwill

Goodwill of $1,324,142 was derived from consolidating WCI effective January 1, 2014, and $102,040 of goodwill related to the 1999 acquisition of a 50% interest in WCI. The Company accounts for its Goodwill in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, which requires the Company to test goodwill for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, rather than amortize. Goodwill impairment tests consist of a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying value. Impairment exists when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value for each reporting unit. To estimate the fair value, management used valuation techniques which included the discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The evaluation of impairment requires the Company to make assumptions about future cash flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and are subject to change as future events and circumstances change. Actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts. Management determined that no impairment write-downs were required as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606 “Revenue Recognition” and FASB ASC Topic 840, Leases. Revenue is reported net of any related sales tax.

Service fees generated by WCI are for monthly services performed to reduce customer’s operating costs. Service fees are invoiced and recognized as revenue in the month services are performed.

For each finance lease, the Company recognized as a gain or loss the amount equal to (i) the net investment in the finance lease less (ii) the net book value of the equipment at inception of the applicable lease. At lease inception we capitalize the total minimum finance lease payments receivable from the lessee, the estimated unguaranteed residual value of the equipment at lease termination, if any, and the initial direct costs related to the lease, less unearned income. Unearned income is recognized as finance income over the term of the lease using the effective interest rate method.

Revenue from consulting agreements is recognized at the time the related services are provided as specified in the consulting agreements.

15

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share

We compute net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. Under the provisions of ASC 260, basic net loss per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing the net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share takes into consideration shares of Common Stock outstanding (computed under basic net loss per share) and potentially dilutive securities that are not anti-dilutive.

Outstanding warrants that had no effect on the computation of dilutive weighted average number of shares outstanding as their effect would be antidilutive were approximately 7,100,000 and 7,400,000 as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. There were 87,456 and 4,500 potentially dilutive shares outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

At June 30, 2018, assumed conversion of Series Q Preferred Stock into Common Stock would be anti-dilutive and is not included in calculating diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding. There were no Series Q Preferred Stock issued at June 30, 2017.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC 740, "Income Taxes," which requires that the Company recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax benefit (expense) results from the change in net deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company applies the provisions of ASC 740, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes". The ASC prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The ASC provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The Company utilizes a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions (tax contingencies). The first step evaluates the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that we will sustain the position on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes. The second step measures the tax benefit as the largest amount more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company did not identify any material uncertain tax positions on returns that have been filed or that will be filed. The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties for unrecognized tax benefits during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, nor were any interest or penalties accrued as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. To the extent the Company may accrue interest and penalties, it elects to recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense.

Advertising and promotion

The Company expenses advertising and promotion costs as incurred. Advertising and promotion costs for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were $24,291 and $27,794, respectively. Advertising and promotion costs for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were $25,449 and $29,641, respectively.

Fair value measurements

The Company adopted ASC 820 which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal, or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

16

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)

Fair value measurements (continued)

The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Topic establish a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the valuation inputs into three broad levels. These three general valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows: Market approach (Level 1) – which uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Prices may be indicated by pricing guides, sale transactions, market trades, or other sources. Cost approach (Level 2) – which is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost); and the Income approach (Level 3) – which uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations about the future amounts (including present value techniques, and option-pricing models). Net present value is an income approach where a stream of expected cash flows is discounted at an appropriate market interest rate.

The carrying amounts of cash, cash in attorney trust account, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable, customer deposits and other accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices in active markets.

The fair value of the investment in account receivable is based on the net present value of calculated interest and principle payments. The carrying value approximates fair value as interest rates charged are comparable to market rates for similar investments.

The fair value of notes receivable and finance leases receivable is based on the net present value of calculated interest and principle payments. The carrying value approximates fair value as interest rates charged are comparable to market rates for similar notes and leases.

The fair value of long-term notes payable is based on the net present value of calculated interest and principle payments. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates fair value due to the fact that the interest rate on the debt is based on market rates.

Note 3 - Cash in attorney trust account

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had combined balances of $0 and $314,536 held in two attorney trust accounts. The accounts did not bear interest and the Company could withdraw funds any time at its discretion.

Note 4 - Prepaid expenses and other assets

Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:

Note 5 - Bhang Corporation (formerly known as Bhang Chocolate Company, Inc.) and Judgment

The Company entered into an agreement with Bhang Chocolate Company, Inc., the predecessor in interest to Bhang Corporation (together “Bhang”), effective February 28, 2014. As part of that agreement, which was ultimately rescinded, Mentor delivered $1,500,000 to Bhang which Bhang refused to return following rescission of the agreement. Following arbitration of the dispute, on December 29, 2016, Mentor obtained a judgment in the amount of $1,921,534 against Bhang Corporation and its predecessor in interest, Bhang Chocolate Company, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The judgment accrued interest at the rate of 10% from December 29, 2016 until November 20, 2017, when the parties stipulated to payment terms.

17

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 5 - Bhang Corporation (formerly known as Bhang Chocolate Company, Inc.) and Judgment (continued)

On January 23, 2018, the Company received a net payment of $1,758,949 in satisfaction of the judgment and 117,000 shares of Mentor common stock, originally sold to two Bhang shareholders, were returned to Mentor in exchange for a payment of $286,719 to the two Bhang shareholders, which was offset from the judgment of $2,045,668. Receipt of Common Stock returned by the Bhang shareholders was accounted for as a reduction of outstanding Common Stock and reduction to the Receivable from Bhang Chocolate Company by the original purchase price of $228,150 upon their receipt by Mentor in January 2018.

The receivable and accrued interest consisted of the following:

Note 6 – Investment in account receivable

On April 10, 2015, the Company entered into an exchange agreement whereby the Company received an investment in an account receivable with installment payments of $117,000 per year for 11 years totaling $1,287,000 in exchange for 757,059 shares of Mentor Common Stock obtained through exercise of Series D warrants at $1.60 per share.

The Company valued the transaction based on the market value of Company common shares exchanged in the transaction, resulting in a 17.87% discount from the face value of the account receivable. The discount is being amortized monthly to interest over the 11 year term of the agreement. The April 10, 2015 investment in account receivable is supported by an exchange agreement and consisted of the following:

For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, $21,401 and $22,591 of discount amortization is included in interest income, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, $36,352 and $46,193 of discount amortization is included in interest income, respectively.

18

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 7 - Property and equipment

Property and equipment is comprised of the following:

Depreciation and amortization expense was $4,356 and $4,105 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was $8,656 and $8,054 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Note 8 – Convertible notes receivable

Convertible notes receivable consists of the following:

19

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 8 – Convertible notes receivable (continued)

*The Conversion Price for the Note is the lower of (i) 75% of the price paid in the Next Equity Financing, or the price obtained by dividing a $3,000,000 valuation cap by the fully diluted number of shares. The number of Conversion Shares issued on conversion shall be the quotient obtained by dividing the outstanding principal and unpaid accrued interest on a Note to be converted on the date of conversion by the Conversion Price (the “Total Number of Shares”). The Total Number of Shares shall consist of Preferred Stock and Common Stock as follows: (i) That number of shares of Preferred Stock obtained by dividing (a) the principal amount of each Note and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder by (b) the price per share paid by other purchasers of Preferred Stock in the Next Equity Financing (such number of shares, the "Number of Preferred Stock") and (ii) that number of shares of Common Stock equal to the Total Number of Shares minus the Number of Preferred Stock. Using the valuation cap of $3,000,000, the Notes would today convert into 251,619 Conversion Shares. In the event of a Corporate Transaction prior to repayment or conversion of the Note, the Company shall receive back two times its investment, plus all accrued unpaid interest.  

Note 9 - Note purchase agreement and consulting agreement with G FarmaLabs Limited

On March 17, 2017, the Company entered into a Notes Purchase Agreement with G FarmaLabs Limited (“G Farma”), a Nevada corporation. Under the Agreement the Company purchased two secured promissory notes from G Farma in an aggregate principal amount of $500,000, both of which bear interest at 7.42% per annum, with monthly payments beginning on April 15, 2017, and mature on April 15, 2022. The first promissory note in the amount of $120,000 is for the purchase of real estate, which is to be secured by a deed of trust on real property and requires monthly payments of $1,107 beginning April 15, 2017 with a balloon payment of approximately $94,164 at maturity. Should no property be selected to secure the real estate loan it will be converted to a working capital loan. The second promissory note in the amount of $380,000 was to be used for working capital and requires monthly payments of $3,505 with a balloon payment of approximately $298,185 at maturity. The two G Farma notes, as amended by the subsequent addenda below, are secured by all property, real and personal, tangible or intangible of G Farma and are guaranteed by two majority shareholders of G Farma. The Company and G Farma have executed five addenda subsequent to the original agreement.

Addendum II (the “Addendum II”) on April 28, 2017, in which Mentor invested an additional $100,000 in G Farma by increasing the aggregate principal face amount of the working capital note to $480,000 and increasing the monthly payments on the working capital note to $4,427 per month. The maturity date remained the same resulting in a total balloon payment of approximately $377,095 at maturity.

Addendum III (the “Addendum III”) on June 4, 2017, in which Mentor invested an additional $100,000 in G Farma by increasing the aggregate principal face amount of the working capital note to $580,000 and increasing the monthly payments on the working capital note to $5,350 per month. The maturity date remained the same resulting in a total balloon payment of approximately $456,877 at maturity.

Addendum IV (the “Addendum IV”) on September 26, 2017, in which Mentor invested an additional $100,000 in G Farma by increasing the aggregate principal face amount of the of the working capital note to $680,000, resulting in payments of $6,272 per month beginning November 15, 2017. The maturity date remained the same resulting in a total balloon payment of approximately $538,372 at maturity.

Addendum V (the “Addendum V”) on December 6, 2017, in which Mentor invested an additional $100,000 in G Farma by increasing the aggregate principal face amount of the of the working capital note to $780,000, resulting in payments of $8,301 per month beginning January 15, 2018. The maturity date remained the same resulting in a total balloon payment of approximately $620,708 at maturity.

Addendum VI (the “Addendum VI”) on January 17, 2018, in which Mentor invested an additional $100,000 in G Farma by increasing the aggregate principal face amount of the working capital note to $880,000, resulting in payments of $9,223 per month beginning February 15, 2018. The maturity date remained the same resulting in a total balloon payment of approximately $703,874 at maturity.

Associated with the Notes Purchase Agreement, on March 17, 2017, the Company and G Farma entered into a Rights Agreement which provides that G Farma will not register its stock in a public offering unless it either (i) obtains the written consent of the Company, or (ii) without the Company’s written consent if G Farma issues to the Company shares of each class or series of G Farma stock then outstanding equal to 1.5% of each such number of shares, calculated on a full dilution full conversion basis. The addition of each addendum has increased item (ii) resulting in a current rate of 3.0% of outstanding shares as of June 30, 2018.

20

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 8 – Convertible notes receivable (continued)

In addition, on March 17, 2017, the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with G Farma whereby the Company will receive a monthly consulting fee in arears of $1,400 per month beginning April 15, 2017 and continuing until the later of (i) 12 months, and (ii) the date on which G Farma has paid in full all obligations under the Notes Purchase Agreement. This monthly consulting fee increased to $1,680 by Addendum II beginning with the May 15, 2017 payment, was not changed by Addendum III, increased to $1,960 by Addendum IV beginning with the November 15, 2017 payment, increased to $2,240 by Addendum V beginning with the January 15, 2018 payment, and increased to $2,520 by Addendum VI beginning on March 15, 2018. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, $7,560 and $4,760 of consulting fees from G Farma is included in revenue, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, $14,560 and $4,760 of consulting fees from G Farma is included in revenue, respectively.

Note 9 - Note purchase agreement and consulting agreement with G FarmaLabs Limited (continued)

Notes receivable from G Farma consists of the following:

Note 10 – Finance leases receivable

Mentor Partner I

On January 16, 2018, Partner I entered into a Master Equipment Lease Agreement with G FarmaLabs Limited and GFarma Brands, Inc. (the “GFarma Entities”) dated January 16, 2018. Partner I acquired and delivered manufacturing equipment as determined by GFarma Entities under sales-type finance leases. The Company recorded equipment sales revenue of $317,680 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and $470,084 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. At June 30, 2018, all leased equipment under the finance leases receivable is located in California.

The net investment included in finance leases at June 30, 2018 are as follows:

There were no finance leases receivable at December 31, 2017.

21

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 10 – Finance leases receivable (continued)

At June 30, 2018, minimum future payments receivable under finance leases were as follows:

Mentor Partner II

On February 11, 2018, Partner II entered into a Master Equipment Lease Agreement with Pueblo West, a Colorado limited liability company (“Pueblo West”). No equipment had been delivered to Pueblo West as of June 30, 2018.

We review the finance leases receivables by individual account to determine expected collectability. The allowance for credit losses is an estimate of the losses inherent in our finance receivables taking into consideration past loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of underlying collateral and current economic conditions. No allowance is recorded at June 30, 2018.

The Company records prepayments on leases as a liability under deferred revenue.

Note 11 – Deposits on manufacturing equipment purchases

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Partner I had deposits with manufacturing equipment suppliers in the amount of $381,455 and $0, respectively, for equipment that will be leased by the G Farma entities in California once the equipment is delivered.

At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Partner II has deposits for manufacturing equipment with one supplier in the amount of $176,400 and $0, respectively, for equipment that will be leased by Pueblo West in Colorado.

Note 12 - Contractual interest in legal recovery

On March 22, 2017, G Farma purchased 222,223 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock in a private placement at a price of $2.25 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $500,002. Pursuant to Addendum II entered into on April 28, 2017, G Farma purchased an additional 66,667 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $1.50 per share for a purchase price of $100,000. The combined total purchase of $600,002 is to be paid as follows: (i) Assignment to the Company of an interest, equal to the amount of the purchase price, in any and all civil forfeiture or similar recoveries received by, or due to, G Farma including a $10 million claim filed March 29, 2017 against the County of Calaveras, or (ii) at any time before payment of the full purchase price from recovery, the Company may elect to have G Farma pay all or some of the purchase price on the date of the maturity of the promissory notes, described above under the Notes Purchase Agreement, or (iii) The Company may elect to have G Farma pay all or some of the purchase price by issuance to the Company of G Farma securities in aggregate amount equal to the purchase price as are offered to any other person (other than stock options offered to employees).

The Company has a significant portion of its assets invested in G Farma entities. These investments include the notes receivable described in Note 9, the finance leases receivable described in Note 10, and the contractual interest in legal recovery described in Note 12. At June 30, 2018, 2018 and December 31, 2017, these assets represent 26% and 19% of the consolidated total assets of the Company, respectively.

22

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 13 - Concentration of credit risk (continued)

The Company closely monitors each investment quarterly based on known and inherent risks in our investments which include financial results, satisfying scheduled payments and compliance with financial covenants, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of underlying collateral and current economic conditions. No impairments or reserves are recorded at June 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017 for these investments.

Note 14 – Investments and fair value

We account for our financial assets in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The fair value measurement disclosures are grouped into three levels based on valuation factors: Level 1 represents assets valued at quoted prices in active markets using identical assets; Level 2 represents assets valued using significant other observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other observable inputs; and, Level 3 represents assets valued using significant unobservable inputs.

The hierarchy of Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 Assets are listed as following:

23

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 14 – Investments and fair value (continued)

The amortized costs, gross unrealized holding gains and losses, and fair values of the Company’s investment securities classified as equity securities, at fair value, at June 30, 2018 consists of the following:

The portion of unrealized gains and losses for the period related to equity securities still held at the reporting date is calculated as follows:

Note 15 - Common stock warrants

The Company's Plan of Reorganization, which was approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California on January 11, 2000, provided for the creditors and claimants to receive new warrants in settlement of their claims. The warrants expire May 11, 2038.

All Series A, B, C and D warrants have been called and all Series A, and C warrants have been exercised. All Series B warrants had been exercised at December 31, 2017 however, on January 23, 2018, 117,000 shares of Mentor’s Common Stock purchased in 2014 through warrant exercises by two Bhang shareholders under an agreement that was ultimately rescinded, were returned to the Company (see Note 5) and the associated exercise of warrants was reversed with 87,456 Series B warrants and 29,544 Series D warrants reinstated. As a result of the reinstatement, 6,316,115 Series D warrants remain outstanding. However, the Company intends to allow warrant holders or Company designees, in place of original holders, additional time as needed to exercise the remaining series B and D warrants. The Company may lower the exercise price of all or part of a warrant series at any time. Similarly, the Company could, but does not anticipate, reverse splitting the stock to raise the stock price above the warrant exercise price. The warrants are specifically not affected and do not split with the shares in the event of a reverse split. If the called warrants are not exercised, the Company has the right to designate the warrants to a new holder in return for a $0.10 per share redemption fee payable to the original warrant holders as discussed further in Note 16. All such changes in the exercise price of warrants were provided for by the court in the Plan of Reorganization to provide a mechanism for all debtors to receive value even if they could not or did not exercise their warrant. Therefore, Management believes that the act of lowering the exercise price is not a change from the original warrant grants and the Company did not record an accounting impact as the result of such change in exercise prices.

24

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 15 - Common stock warrants (continued)

All Series A and Series C warrants were exercised by December 31, 2014. Exercise prices in effect at January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2018 for Series B warrants were $0.11 and Series D warrants were $1.60. In March 2014, as part of a since rescinded transaction, 87,456 Series B warrants were exercised. In April 2017, the remaining 4,500 Series B warrants were exercised. On January 23, 2018, following return of the shares purchased under the rescinded transaction, 87,456 of the Series B warrants were reinstated. As of June 30, 2018, 87,456 Series B warrants remain outstanding.

In 2009, the Company entered into an Investment Banking agreement with Network One Securities, LLC and a related Strategic Advisory Agreement with Lenox Hill Partners, LP with regard to a potential merger with a cancer development company. In conjunction with those related agreements, the Company issued 689,159 Series H ($7) Warrants, with a 30 year life. The warrants are subject to cashless exercise based upon the ten day trailing closing bid price preceding the exercise as interpreted by the Company.

As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017 the weighted average contractual life for all Mentor warrants was 20.0 years and 20.5 years, respectively, and the weighted average outstanding warrant exercise price was $2.11 and $2.11 per share, respectively.

During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, a total of 379,436 and 1,424,883 warrants were exercised, respectively. There were no warrants issued during the periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. In January 2018, the 2014 exercise of 87,456 Series B warrants and 29,544 Series D warrants by two Bhang shareholders under an agreement that was ultimately rescinded, were reversed and reinstated, see Note 5. The intrinsic value of outstanding warrants at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $71,714 and $0, respectively.

The following table summarizes Series B and Series D common stock warrants as of each period:

Series E, F, G and H warrants were issued for investment banking and advisory services during 2009. Series E, F and G warrants were exercised in 2014. The following table summarizes Series H ($7) warrants as of each period:

25

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 15 - Common stock warrants (continued)

On February 9, 2015, in accordance with Section 1145 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and the Company’s Plan of Reorganization, the Company announced a minimum 30 day partial redemption of up to 1% (approximately 90,000) of the already outstanding Series D warrants to provide for the court specified redemption mechanism for warrants not exercised timely by the original holder or their estates. Company designees that applied during the 30 days paid 10 cents per warrant to redeem the warrant and then exercised the Series D warrant to purchase a share at the court specified formula of not more than one-half of the closing bid price on the day preceding the 30 day exercise period. In the Company’s October 7, 2016 press release, Mentor stated that the 1% redemptions which were formerly priced on a calendar month schedule would subsequently be initiated and be priced on a random date schedule after the prior 1% redemption is completed to prevent potential third party manipulation of share prices at month-end. The periodic partial redemptions will continue to be periodically recalculated and repeated until such unexercised warrants are exhausted, or the partial redemption is otherwise suspended or truncated by the Company. Redemptions for the six months ended June 30, 2018 were for Series D Warrants at their full redemption price of $1.60. On February 10, 2017, there was one partial redemption request accepted to exercise 100,000 outstanding Series D warrants for an exercise price of $90,000 plus warrant redemption fees of $10,000. For the remainder of 2017 there were 1,540,382 Series D warrants exercised at the regular redemption price of $1.60 for Series D warrants for $2,394,611 plus warrant redemption fees of $92,054. Also, in 2017, 4,500 outstanding Series B warrants were exercised at an exercise price of $495. The regular and 1% partial redemption authorization, which was recalculated and repeated according to the court formula, resulted in a combined average exercise price of $1.55 for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Note 16 - Warrant redemption liability

The Plan of Reorganization provides the right for the Company to call, and the Company or its designee to redeem warrants that are not exercised timely, as specified in the Plan, by transferring a $0.10 redemption fee to the former holders. Certain individuals desiring to become a Company designee to redeem warrants have deposited redemption fees with the Company that, when warrants are redeemed, will be forwarded to the former warrant holders at their last known address 30 days after the last warrant of a class is exercised, or earlier at the discretion of the Company. The Company has arranged for a service to process the redemption fees in offset to an equal amount of liability.

In prior years the Series A and Series C redemption fees have been distributed through DTCC into holder’s brokerage accounts or directly to the holders and are no longer outstanding. On April 14, 2017, the remaining Series B warrants were exercised for 4,500 shares of common stock. The Company announced on April 17, 2017 that warrant holders to whom approximately 3,000,000 Series B Warrants were originally issued will receive the $0.10 per warrant redemption payment per the Plan. Payment of the Series B redemption fee was made by the Company’s redemption service and funded personally by Chet Billingsley who has assumed liability for paying the warrant redemptions. For warrant holders who had deposited their Series B warrants with a broker their redemption payments were processed electronically on April 20, 2017 through the DTCC participant system. Payment to other Series B warrant holders who had presented their Series B warrants to the Company were mailed directly to the warrant holder by April 20, 2017.

Once the D warrants have been fully redeemed and exercised the fees for the D warrant series will likewise be distributed. The President and CEO, Chet Billingsley has agreed to assume liability for paying the redemption fees and therefore warrant redemption fees received are retained by the Company for operating costs. Should Mr. Billingsley be incapacitated or otherwise become unable to pay the warrant redemption fees, the Company will remit the warrant redemption fees to former holders from amounts due Mr. Billingsley from the Company which are sufficient to cover the redemption fee at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Note 17 - Stockholders’ equity

Common Stock

The Company was incorporated in California in 1994 and was redomiciled as a Delaware corporation, effective September 24, 2015. There are 75,000,000 authorized shares of Common Stock at $0.0001 par value. The holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders.

On August 8, 2014, the Company announced that it was initiating the repurchase of approximately 2% of the Company’s common shares outstanding at that time. As of June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, 44,748 and 44,748 shares have been repurchased and retired, respectively.

26

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 17 - Stockholders’ equity (continued)

Preferred Stock

Mentor has 5,000,000, $0.0001 par value, preferred shares authorized.

On July 13, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation of Rights, Preferences, Privileges and Restrictions of Series Q Preferred Stock (“Certificate of Designation”) with the Delaware Secretary of State to designate 200,000 preferred shares as Series Q Preferred Stock, such series having a par value of $0.0001 per share. Series Q Preferred Stock are convertible into Common Stock, at the option of the holder, at any time after the date of issuance of such share and prior to notice of redemption of such share of Series Q Preferred Stock by the Company, into such number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of Common Stock as determined by dividing the Series Q Conversion Value by the Conversion Price at the time in effect for such share.

The per share “Series Q Conversion Value”, as defined in the Certificate of Designation, shall be calculated by the Company at least once each calendar quarter as follows: The per share Series Q Conversion Value shall be equal the quotient of the “Core Q Holdings Asset Value” divided by the number of issued and outstanding shares of Series Q Preferred Stock. The "Core Q Holdings Asset Value" shall equal the value, as calculated and published by the Company, of all assets that constitute Core Q Holdings which shall include such considerations as the Company designates and need not accord with any established or commonly employed valuation method or considerations. “Core Q Holdings” generally consists of all proceeds received by the Company on sale of shares of Series Q Preferred Stock and all securities, acquisitions, and business acquired from such proceeds by the Company. The Company shall periodically, but at least once each calendar quarter, identify, update, account for and value, the assets that comprise the Core Q Holdings.

The "Conversion Price" of the Series Q Preferred Stock shall be at the product of 105% and the closing price of the Company's Common Stock on a date designated and published by the Company. The Series Q Preferred Stock is intended to allow for a pure play investment in cannabis companies that have the potential to go public. The Series Q Preferred Stock will be available only to accredited, institutional or qualified investors.

Note 18 - Lease commitments

Operating Leases

Mentor currently rents approximately 2,000 square feet of office space under a one year lease in Ramona, California in San Diego County, expiring in July 2019. Subsequent to June 30, 2018 the lease was renewed through August 2019. Rent expense for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $7,700 and $7,350, respectively. Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $15,400 and $14,700, respectively.

WCI manages its Arizona and Texas business from its Tempe, Arizona location where it leases approximately 3,000 square feet of office and warehouse space under an operating lease expiring in January 2020. Rent expense for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $6,600 and $6,633, respectively. Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $13,200 and $11,055, respectively.

WCI leases vehicles under a master fleet management agreement with initial terms of 4 years expiring through October 2021. Vehicle lease expense included in cost of sales in the condensed consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $62,335 and $43,778, respectively. Vehicle lease expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $112,642 and $87,159, respectively.

WCI has two small operating leases on office equipment entered into in 2015 with terms of 5 years expiring in 2020.

27

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 18 - Lease commitments (continued)

WCI leases vehicles under a master fleet management agreement with initial terms of 4 years expiring through October 2021. Vehicle lease expense included in cost of sales in the condensed consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $62,335 and $43,778, respectively. Vehicle lease expense for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $112,642 and $87,159, respectively.

WCI has two small operating leases on office equipment entered into in 2015 with terms of 5 years expiring in 2020.

The approximate remaining annual minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable operating leases existing as of June 30, 2018 with original or remaining terms over one year were as follows:

Note 19 - Long term debt

Long term debt

Long term debt consists of the following:

Commercial credit agreement with Bond Street Servicing, LLC

WCI entered into a commercial credit agreement with Bond Street Servicing, LLC which required a $4,000 loan service fee. The service fee is being amortized as additional interest over the life of the loan on a straight line basis.

28

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 20 - Accrued salary, accrued retirement and incentive fee - related party

The Company had an outstanding liability to Mr. Billingsley, its Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), as follows:

In January 2014, the CEO, for the benefit of the Company, allowed two Bhang shareholders to act in his stead as designees and exercise 87,456 of his Series B warrants under the agreement described in Note 5 that was ultimately rescinded. In exchange for allowing the Bhang shareholders to exercise his lower priced Series B warrants, Mr. Billingsley was named as designee of 87,456 of the higher priced Series D warrants. In January 2018, the shares of Common Stock held by the Bhang shareholders were returned to and cancelled by Mentor and the warrants from which the shares arose were reinstated, see Notes 5 and 15. On March 17, 2018, the Board approved reallocation of the reinstated 87,456 Series B warrants back to Mr. Billingsley and his holdings of warrants were concurrently decreased by 87,456 Series D warrants (although Mr. Billingsley may be designated as a Series D warrant designee at any time).

As provided by Board of Director resolution in 1998, the CEO will be paid an incentive fee and a bonus which are payable in installments at the CEO’s option. The incentive fee is 1% of the increase in market capitalization based on the bid price of the Company’s stock beyond the book value at confirmation of the bankruptcy, which was approximately $260,000. The bonus is 0.5% of the increase in market capitalization for each $1.00 increase in stock price up to a maximum of $8 per share (4%) based on the bid price of the stock beyond the book value at confirmation of the bankruptcy. No incentive fee expense was recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The incentive fee expense was $0 and $175,997 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Note 21 - Patent and License Fee Facility with Larson

Effective April 4, 2016 Mentor Capital, Inc. entered into a certain "Larson - Mentor Capital, Inc. Patent and License Fee Facility with Agreement Provisions for an -- 80% / 20% Domestic Economic Interest -- 50% / 50% Foreign Economic Interest" agreement with R. L. Larson and Larson Capital, LLC (“Larson”). Under this agreement, Mentor’s subsidiary Mentor Capital IP, LLC (“MCIP”) obtained rights in an international patent application for foreign THC and CBD cannabis vape pens under the provisions of the Patent Cooperation Treaty of 1970, as amended. If and upon approval of the United States patent application, Larson intends to seek exclusive licensing rights in the United States for THC and CBD cannabis vape pens for various THC and CBD percentage ranges and concentrations. Per the agreement Mentor paid $25,000 in exchange for 15.7% of the domestic licensing rights and 41.4% of international licensing rights for the vape pens.

Note 22 – Commitments and contingencies

On December 29, 2016, Mentor obtained a judgment in the amount of $1,921,535 against Bhang Corporation and its predecessor in interest, Bhang Chocolate Company, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California related to an action filed by Mentor on August 11, 2014 seeking rescission of the February 28, 2014 co-operative funding agreement with Bhang Corporation (“Bhang Agreement”) and return of the $1,500,000 paid by the Company to Bhang. The judgment accrued interest at the rate of 10% from December 29, 2016 until November 20, 2017, when the parties agreed to stipulated payment terms.

On January 23, 2018, the Company received a net payment of $1,758,949 in satisfaction of the judgement and 117,000 shares of Mentor common stock, originally sold to two Bhang founders, were returned to Mentor in exchange for a payment of $286,719, which was offset from the accrued judgment amount of $2,045,668, see Note 5.

In July 2015, Mentor was served with a complaint in an action in the United States District Court for the District of Utah initiated by the wife and daughter of Bhang’s corporate counsel related to 75,000 shares of Mentor’s Common Stock purchased from Bhang Corporation’s CEO in a secondary sale. The 75,000 shares at issue were returned to Mentor as a part of the Bhang settlement above. On December 21, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion to dismiss their complaint with prejudice which was granted on January 25, 2018. Within the same order, the Court vacated an earlier order dated September 25, 2017, related to issuance of Mentor’s stock. On February 2, 2018, Mentor’s third-party claims, related to plaintiffs’ now-dismissed complaint, were dismissed with prejudice

29

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 23 – Segment Information

The Company is operating an acquisition and investment business. Majority owned subsidiaries of 51% or more are consolidated. The Company has determined that there are two reportable segments; 1) the cannabis and medical marijuana segment which includes the fair value of securities investments in GW Pharmaceuticals plc (GWPH), [Kush Bottles, Inc., and Solis Tek, Inc.] stock, the fair value of membership interests of Electrum, convertible notes receivables and accrued interest from NeuCourt, the notes receivable from G Farma, the contractual interest in the G Farma legal recovery, finance leases to G Farma and Pueblo West, and the operation of subsidiaries in the Cannabis and medical marijuana sector, and 2) the Company’s legacy investment in WCI which works with business park owners, governmental centers, and apartment complexes to reduce their facility related operating costs. The Company also has certain small cancer related legacy investments and an investment in note receivable from a non-affiliated party that is included in the Corporate and Eliminations section below.

30

Mentor Capital, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2018 and 2017

Note 23 – Segment Information (continued)

The following table reconciles operating segments and corporate-unallocated operating income (loss) to consolidated income before income taxes, as presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated income statements:

Note 24 – Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

The changes in the balances for accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) were as follows:

Note 25 – Subsequent events

Effective August 6, 2018, the Company was accepted as an OTCQX reporting company which is a move up from the OTCQB.

31

The following discussion will assist in the understanding of our financial position at June 30, 2018 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The information below should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes to the financial statements included within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Corporate Background

Beginning September 2008, after the name change back to Mentor Capital, Inc., the Company’s common stock traded publicly under the trading symbol OTC Markets: MNTR and after February 2015 as OTCQB: MNTR. Effective August 6, 2018, the Company’s common stock will trade under the trading symbol OTCQX: MNTR.

In 2009 the Company began focusing its investing activities in leading edge cancer companies. In response to government limitations on reimbursement for highly technical and expensive cancer treatments and a resulting business decline in the cancer immunotherapy sector, the Company decided to exit that space. In the summer of 2013 the Company was asked to consider investing in a cancer related project with a medical marijuana focus. On August 29, 2013, the Company made a decision to begin to divest of its cancer assets and focus future investments in the medical marijuana and cannabis sector.

Acquisitions and investments

Waste Consolidators, Inc. (WCI)

WCI is a legacy investment of which the Company owns a 51% interest and is included in the condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

Bhang Corporation fka Bhang Chocolate Company, Inc.

Electrum Partners, LLC (Electrum)

Electrum is a Nevada based cannabis consulting, investment and management company. The Company invested $100,000 in Electrum as a convertible note receivable on March 12, 2014. Effective June 30, 2017, Mentor converted the note plus $7,772 of accrued interest into 5,672 membership interest units in Electrum at an equity conversion rate of $19 per membership interest unit, which was equal to approximately 4.51% of Electrum’s outstanding equity as of December 31, 2017.

On April 28, 2017 the Company invested a second $100,000 in Electrum (Note II) as a convertible note with interest at 10% compounded monthly, with monthly payments of principal and interest of $2,290 beginning June 12, 2017. On May 31, 2018, Mentor converted the outstanding principal Note II balance of $85,188 plus accrued interest of $1,068 into an additional 526 membership interest units at a fixed conversion rate of $164 per interest.

This investment in Electrum is reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as an investment at cost of $194,028 and $107,772 at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

32

Mentor IP, LLC (MCIP)

On April 18, 2016, the Company formed Mentor IP, LLC (“MCIP”), a South Dakota limited liability company and wholly owned subsidiary of Mentor. MCIP was formed to hold the patent rights obtained on April 4, 2016 when Mentor Capital, Inc. entered into that certain "Larson - Mentor Capital, Inc. Patent and License Fee Facility with Agreement Provisions for an -- 80% / 20% Domestic Economic Interest -- 50% / 50% Foreign Economic Interest" with R. L. Larson and Larson Capital, LLC (“MCIP Agreement”). Pursuant to the MCIP Agreement, MCIP obtained rights to an international patent application for foreign THC and CBD cannabis vape pens under the provisions of the Patent Cooperation Treaty of 1970, as amended. If and upon approval of the United States patent application, Larson intends to seek exclusive licensing rights in the United States for THC and CBD cannabis vape pens for various THC and CBD percentage ranges and concentrations.

NeuCourt, Inc.

On November 8, 2016, the Company invested $25,000 in NeuCourt, Inc. (“NeuCourt”) as a convertible note receivable and an additional investment of $25,000 was made as a convertible note receivable in NeuCourt on November 22, 2017 for a total investment of $50,000 (together “Notes”). Principal and unpaid interest on the Notes may be converted into a blend of shares of a to-be-created series of Preferred Stock and Common Stock of NeuCourt (i) on closing of a future financing round of at least $750,000, (ii) on the election of NeuCourt on maturity of the Note, or (iii) on election of Mentor following NeuCourt’s election to prepay the Note. NeuCourt is a Delaware corporation that is developing a technology that is expected to be useful in the cannabis space.

GlauCanna

On April 13, 2017, the Company agreed to provide $40,000 of funding to offset costs for the application of cannabis oil in a glaucoma study conducted by and otherwise paid for by Dr. Robert M. Mandelkorn, MD. In exchange for the funding Mentor, dba GlauCanna, will hold an 80% interest in any commercial opportunities that result from the study; Dr. Mandelkorn will hold the remaining 20%.

G Farmalabs Limited

On March 17, 2017, the Company entered into a Notes Purchase Agreement with G FarmaLabs Limited, a Nevada corporation. Under the Agreement the Company purchased two secured promissory notes from G Farma in an aggregate principal face amount of $500,000. Addenda II through VI increased the investment amount secured by the promissory notes to $1,000,000 as of January 17, 2018, see footnote 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The investment consists of a secured promissory note in the principal face amount of $120,000 intended for purchase of real estate and a second secured promissory note in principal face amount of $880,000 intended for working capital of G Farma. In the event real estate is not purchased to secure the real estate note the $120,000 intended for purchase of real estate will be converted to a working capital loan.

Associated with the Notes Purchase Agreement, on March 17, 2017, the Company and G Farma entered into a Rights Agreement, subsequently amended, which provides that G Farma will not register its stock in a public offering unless it either (i) obtains the written consent of the Company, or (ii) without the Company’s written consent if G Farma issues to the Company shares of each class or series of G Farma stock then outstanding equal to 3.0% of each such number of shares, calculated on a full dilution full conversion basis. See footnotes 9 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Also, on March 17, 2017 the Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with G Farma, which has been subsequently amended, whereby the Company will provide consulting services to G Farma. The monthly consulting payment was increased to $2,520 per month under the January 17, 2018 Addendum VI modification.

Mentor Partner I, LLC

On September 19, 2017, the Company formed Mentor Partner I, LLC (“Partner I”), a California limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Mentor for the purpose of cannabis-focused acquisition and investing. For the period of inception to December 31, 2017 there were no operations. In the six months ended June 30, 2018, Mentor contributed $825,000 of capital to Partner I to facilitate the purchase of manufacturing equipment to be leased from Partner I by G FarmaLabs Limited (“G Farma”) under a Master Equipment Lease Agreement dated January 16, 2018, as amended. At June 30, 2018, $470,084 of equipment was delivered under the lease agreement and $378,363 was paid on deposits for manufacturing equipment.

33

Mentor Partner II, LLC

On February 1, 2018, the Company formed Mentor Partner II, LLC (“Partner II”), a California limited liability company, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Mentor for the purpose of cannabis-focused acquisition and investing. On February 8, 2018, Mentor contributed $400,000 to Partner II to facilitate the purchase of manufacturing equipment to be leased from Partner II by Pueblo West under a Master Equipment Lease Agreement dated February 11, 2018. At June 30, 2018, $176,400 was paid on deposit for manufacturing equipment and no equipment had yet been delivered to Pueblo West.

Overview

Our goal is to focus future investments in the medical marijuana and social use cannabis sector. Currently, our general business operations are intended to provide management consultation and headquarters functions, especially with regard to accounting and audits, for our larger investment targets and our majority owned subsidiaries. We monitor our smaller and less than majority positions for value and investment security. Management also spends considerable effort reviewing possible acquisition candidates within the cannabis industry on an ongoing basis.

Mentor seeks to take significant positions in medical marijuana and cannabis companies to provide liquidity for founders, protection for investors, funding for cannabis companies, and to incubate private cannabis companies that have the potential to be spun off as stand-alone pubic companies. When Mentor takes a significant position in its investees it provides financial management when needed but leaves operating control in the hands of the cannabis company founders. Retaining control, receiving greater liquidity, and working with an experienced organization to efficiently develop disclosures and compliance to consider the public markets are three key advantages to cannabis founders working with Mentor Capital, Inc.

Because adult social use and medical marijuana opportunities often overlap, Mentor Capital participates in the legal recreational marijuana market. However, Mentor’s preferred focus is medical, and the company seeks to facilitate the application of cannabis to cancer wasting, Parkinson’s disease, calming seizures, reducing ocular pressures from glaucoma and blunting chronic pain.

Business Segments

We manage our operations through two operating segments, a cannabis and medical marijuana segment which is our current focus of business, and a legacy investment acquired prior to the Company’s focus in the cannabis and medical marijuana segment. The largest legacy investment is in WCI which works with business park owners, governmental centers, and apartment complexes to reduce their operating costs. Upon the occurrence of a divestment event for any legacy asset, the resulting proceeds are earmarked to be re-invested into the cannabis segment.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s future success is dependent upon its ability to make a return on its investments, to generate positive cash flow and to obtain sufficient capital from non-portfolio-related sources. Management believes they have three years of operating resources on hand and can raise additional funds as may be needed to support their business plan and develop an operating, cash flow positive company.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2017

Revenues

Revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was $1,231,260 compared to $764,549 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 (“the prior year period”), an increase of $466,711 or 61.0%. This increase is due to an increase in monthly service fees of $134,867, leased equipment sales of $317,680 compared to $0 for the prior year period, finance lease revenue of $11,364 compared to $0 for the prior year period and an increase in consulting revenue of $2,800 compared to the prior year period.

Gross profit

Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was $378,564 compared to $268,664 for the prior year period. Cost of goods sold relate primarily to WCI and Partner I. WCI experienced gross profit of 32.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to 34.7% for the prior year period, a decrease of (2.7%). Partner I began operations in February 2018 and had gross profit of 25.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

34

The decrease in WCI gross profit was due to an increase in fuel costs of 2.1%, an increase in vehicle costs of 1.1% and an increase in other cost of goods sold of 0.3%, partially offset by a decrease in salary, contract labor and related costs of (0.8%), as a percent of WCI revenue over the prior year period.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was $563,380 compared to $545,956 for the prior year period, an increase of $17,424. The increase is due to a $9,581 increase in insurance expense, and a $32,500 increase in management fees, partially offset by a ($16,286) decrease in professional fees and a ($8,371) decrease in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the current period as compared to the prior year period.

Other income and expense

Other income and expense, net, totaled $108,635 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $31,847 for the prior year period, an increase of $76,788. Of the increase $66,606 is due to gains on investments recognized in the current year period compared to losses on investments of $0 in the prior year period. In addition, there was an increase in interest income of $8,206 and an increase of $2,380 of other income, partially offset by a ($404) increase in interest expense in the current period as compared to the prior year period.

Net results

The net result for the three months ended June 30, 2018 was a loss attributable to Mentor of ($74,606) or ($0.003) per Mentor common share compared to net loss attributable to Mentor in the prior year period of ($258,246) or ($0.011) per Mentor common share. Management will continue to make an effort to lower operating expenses and increase revenue and gross margin. The Company will continue to look for acquisition opportunities to expand its portfolio in the cannabis industry in larger companies that are positive for operating revenue or have the potential to become positive for operating revenue.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017

Revenues

Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $2,247,459 compared to $1,502,692 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 (“the prior year six month period”), an increase of $744,767 or 49.6%. This increase is due to an increase in monthly service fees of $252,395, and increase in lease equipment sales of $470,084, and increase in finance lease revenue of $12,488, and an increase in consulting fees of $9,800.

Gross profit

Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $724,271 compared to $532,560 for the prior year six month period. Cost of goods sold relate primarily to WCI who experienced gross profit of 33.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to 35.2% for the prior year six month period, a decrease of (1.6%). This was due to an increase in fuel costs of 1.7% and an increase in other cost of goods sold of 0.2%, partially offset by decrease in vehicle costs of (0.3%) as a percent of revenue over the prior year six month period.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was $1,129,158 compared to $1,194,246 for the prior year six month period, a decrease of ($65,088). The decrease is due to a ($175,997) decrease in incentive fees to the Company CEO, a ($10,417) decrease in costs of providing service to shareholders, and a ($19,596) decrease in professional fees, partially offset by a $21,162 increase in insurance expense, a $21,817 increase in bad debt expense, a $37,500 increase in management fees, a $37,748 increase in salaries, and a $22,695 increase in other selling, general and administrative expenses in the current period as compared to the prior year six month period.

Other income and expense

Other income and expense, net, totaled $195,164 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $56,591 for the prior year six month period, an increase of $138,573. The increase is due to a $118,197 gain on investments in the current six month period, a $18,978 increase in interest income, and a $1,880 increase in other income, partially offset by an increase of ($482) in interest expense in the current six month period as compared to the prior year six month period.

35

Net results

The net result for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was a loss attributable to Mentor of ($226,311) or ($0.010) per common share compared to net loss attributable to Mentor in the prior year six month period of ($636,857) or ($0.029) per common share. Management will continue to make an effort to lower operating expenses and increase revenue and gross margin. The Company will continue to look for acquisition opportunities to expand its portfolio in the cannabis industry in larger companies that are positive for operating revenue or have the potential to become positive for operating revenue.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our reorganization, we have raised capital through warrant holder exercise of warrants for common stock. At June 30, 2018 we had cash and cash equivalents of $2,341,585 and a working capital of $3,553,159. Operating cash inflows in the six months ended June 30, 2018 were $65,225, including a $354,104 decrease in operating assets, a $57,387 increase in operating liabilities, $8,656 of non-cash depreciation and amortization, and $27,942 of non-cash bad debt expense, partially offset by a ($227,373) net loss, ($36,353) of non-cash income related to amortization of discount on investment, ($53,058) deducted for the gain on sale of investment in BDH, ($940) increase in accrued investment interest income, and ($65,140) subtraction for gain on investment securities included in net income (loss). Cash inflows from investing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2018 were $962,803 due to $1,987,099 in proceeds collected on receivable from Bhang Corporation, $4,140 proceeds from convertible notes receivable, $14,965 proceeds from notes receivable, $109,000 proceeds from sale of investment in BDH, and $117,000 proceeds from investment in receivable, partially offset by ($101,441) purchase of investment securities, ($100,000) invested in notes receivable, ($557,855) deposits on equipment to be leased, ($507,706) investment in finance leases receivable, and ($2,399) purchase of property and equipment. Net inflows from financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2018 were $479,367 of which $387,909 were proceeds received from exercise of warrants and $109,985 was from issuance of Series Q preferred stock, offset by ($15,782) of payments on long-term debt, and ($2,745) non-controlling interest distributions. We will be required to raise additional funds through financing, additional collaborative relationships or other arrangements until we are able to raise revenues to a point of positive cash flow.

For the six months ended June 30, 2018, there were no partial redemptions and 379,436 Series D warrants exercised at the normal redemption price of $1.60 for $607,098 and $0 in warrant redemption fees. On February 10, 2017, there was one partial redemption request accepted to exercise 100,000 outstanding Series D warrants for an exercise price of $90,000 plus warrant redemption fees of $10,000. For the remainder of 2017 there were 1,540,382 Series D warrants exercised at the regular redemption price of $1.60 for Series D warrants for $2,394,611 plus warrant redemption fees of $92,054. Also, in 2017, 4,500 outstanding Series B warrants were exercised at an exercise price of $495. We believe that if such redemptions and exercise continue, partial warrant redemptions will provide monthly cash in excess of what is required for monthly operations for an extending period of time while we are exploring other major sources of funding for further acquisitions.

Disclosure About Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements that constitute off-balance sheet arrangements.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this item.

36

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Based on management’s evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our managers, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2018 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

37

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

The Company is not currently engaged in any legal proceedings.

On January 23, 2018 the Company received a net payment of $1,758,949 in satisfaction of the December 29, 2016 judgment awarded by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against Bhang Corporation and its predecessor in interests, Bhang Chocolate Company, Inc. (together “Bhang”) and 117,000 shares of Mentor common stock, originally sold to two Bhang shareholders, were returned to Mentor in exchange for a payment of $286,719 to the two Bhang shareholders, which was offset from the accrued judgment amount of $2,045,668. The shares returned by the Bhang shareholders were received by the Company on January 23, 2018 and were accounted for at that time as a reduction of outstanding Mentor Common Stock and the net payment resulted in a satisfaction of the Receivable from Bhang. See Note 5 to condensed consolidated financial statements.

On January 25, 2018 an action initiated in the United States District for the District of Utah against the Company by the wife and daughter of Bhang’s corporate counsel was dismissed with prejudice. Within the same order, the Court vacated an earlier order dated September 25, 2017, related to issuance of Mentor’s stock. On February 2, 2018, Mentor’s third-party claims, related to plaintiffs’ now-dismissed complaint, were dismissed with prejudice. Please see Mentor’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018 for further information.

In addition to other information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business since it operates in a highly changing and complex business environment that involves numerous risks, some of which are beyond our control. The following discussion highlights a few of these risk factors, any one of which may have a significant adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

As a result of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our Form 10-K, and the risks discussed in our Rule 15c2-11 and other publicly disclosed submissions, actual results could differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.

We face significant risks, and the risks described below may not be the only risks we face. Additional risks that we do not know of or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be harmed, and the trading price of our Common Stock could decline.

Management has a lack of experience operating as a fully reporting company and meeting the associated reporting obligations.

Management has operated Mentor Capital, Inc. as a non-reporting public company for 20 years, and only three years ago voluntarily transitioned to reporting company status subject to financial and other SEC required disclosures. Prior to such voluntary transition, management has not been required to prepare and make such required disclosures. As a reporting company we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of a national securities exchange, and other applicable securities rules and regulations. The Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to our business and operating activities. As management has never before been required to prepare and file these disclosure reports, doing so may impose a significant expense, time and reporting burden upon management. This distraction can divert management from its operation of the business to the detriment of core operations. Also, improper reporting due to inexperience can result in trading restrictions and other sanctions that may impair or even suspend trading in the company Common Stock.

38

Investors may suffer risk of dilution following exercise of warrants for cash.

As of June 30, 2018, the Company had 23,076,676 outstanding shares of its Common Stock trading at approximately $0.93. As of the same date the Company also had 87,456 outstanding Series B warrants exercisable for shares of Common Stock at $0.11 per share and 6,316,115 outstanding Series D warrants exercisable for shares of Common Stock at $1.60 per share. These Series B and D warrants do not have a cashless exercise feature. The Company anticipates that the Series D warrants will be increasingly exercised if the per share price of the Company’s Common Stock is greater than $1.60 per share. Exercise of the Series D warrants may result in immediate and potentially substantial dilution to current holders of the Company’s Common Stock. The Company also has 689,159 outstanding Series H warrants with a per share exercise price of $7.00 held by an investment bank and its affiliates. These $7.00 Series H warrants include a cashless exercise feature. Current and future shareholders may suffer dilution of their investment and equity ownership if any of the warrant holders elect to exercise their warrants.

Beginning on February 9, 2015, in accordance with Section 1145 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and in accordance with the Company’s court-approved Plan of Reorganization, the Company announced that it would allow for partial redemption of up to 1% per month of the outstanding Series D warrants to provide for the court specified redemption mechanism for warrants not exercised timely by the original holder or their estates. On October 7, 2016, the Company announced that the 1% redemptions which were formerly priced on a calendar month schedule would subsequently be initiated and priced on a random date schedule after the prior 1% redemption is complete to prevent potential third party manipulation of share prices during the pricing period at month-end. Company designees that apply during the redemption period must pay 10 cents per warrant to redeem the warrants and then exercise the Series D warrant to purchase a share of the Company’s Common Stock at a maximum of one-half of the closing bid price on the day preceding the 1% partial redemption. The 1% partial redemption may continue to be periodically recalculated and repeated according to the court formula until such unexercised warrants are exhausted or the partial redemption is otherwise slowed or truncated by the Company. From February 11, 2017 through August 9, 2018, the Company has not offered partial redemptions on its Series D warrants.

We operate in a turbulent market populated by businesses that are highly volatile.

The US market for cannabis products is highly volatile. While we believe that it is an exciting and growing market, many companies involved in cannabis products and services used to be involved in illegal activities, some still are, and many of them operate in unconventional ways. Some of these differences which represent challenges to us include not keeping appropriate financial records, inexperience with business contracts, not having access to customary business banking or brokerage relationships, not having quality manufacturing relationships, and not having customary distribution arrangements. Any one of these challenges, if not managed well, could materially adversely impact our business.

Many cannabis activities, products, and services still violate law.

The legal patchwork to which cannabis companies are subject is still evolving and frequently uncertain. While we believe that anti-cannabis laws are softening and that the trend is toward legalization of cannabis products, many states and the US government still view some or all cannabis activity as illegal. Notwithstanding this uncertainty we intend to do our best to engage in activities that are unambiguously legal and to use what influence we have with our affiliates for them to do the same. But we will not always have control over those companies with whom we do business and there is a risk that we could suffer a substantial and material loss due to routine legal prosecution. Similarly, many jurisdictions have adopted so-called “zero tolerance” drug laws and laws prohibiting sale of what is considered drug paraphernalia. If our, or our affiliates’ activities related to cannabis activities, products, and services are deemed to violate one or more federal or state laws, we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties, including fines, impounding of cannabis products, and seizure of our assets.

Our business model is to partner with or acquire other companies.

We do not manufacture or sell cannabis products or services. Rather we try to find cannabis businesses whose products, managers, technology or other factors we like and acquire or invest in those businesses. There is no certainty that we will find suitable partners or that we will be able to engage in transactions on advantageous terms with partners we identify. There is also no certainty that we will be able to consummate a transaction on favorable terms, or any transaction at all, with any potential cannabis related acquisitions or that our partners will be able to navigate the maze of cannabis laws that may affect them. To date several of our acquisitions/investments have not turned out well for us, and an effort to secure a $35 million loan resulted in a $621,250 loss.

39

The Federal Government’s attitude toward cannabis could materially harm our business

Changes to the Federal Government’s administration and the manner in which the federal government regulates cannabis, including how it intends to enforce laws prohibiting medical marijuana and recreational cannabis use could materially negatively affect our business. If recreational use is limited that could represent 75% of the potential overall cannabis market revenues. Eliminating recreational cannabis use would be an existential threat to many cannabis entities. Being historically illegal, many cannabis contracts, including our contracts, may not be able to be enforced in the courts.

Many of the people and entities with whom we work in the cannabis industry are not used to engaging in normal course business transactions.

Many of the people and entities with whom we engage may not be used to operating in business transactions in the normal course. Entities and persons operating in the cannabis industry may be unaccustomed to entering into written agreements or keeping financial records according to GAAP. Additionally, entities and persons with whom we engage may not pay particular attention to the obligations with which they have agreed in written contracts. We have experienced these differences with several different entities in which we’ve invested or considered investing, including an entity which failed to comply with contractual obligations, which led us into litigation and other legal remedies.

Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements.

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that relate to future events or future financial performance. When used in this report, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “seeks”, “looks”, “hopes”, “plans,” “predicts,” “expects,” “estimates,” “intends,” “will,” “continue,” “may,” “potential,” “should” and similar expressions. These statements are only expressions of expectation. Our actual results could, and likely will, differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth above and elsewhere in this report and including factors unanticipated by us and not included herein. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these statements. Accordingly, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on these statements. Where required by applicable law, we will undertake to update any disclosures or forward-looking statements.

A failure to obtain financing could prevent us from executing our business plan.